Friday, January 28, 2005

Live Gig Review: The Story Of The Beastie Boys, Live At The Hordern Pavilion.


Chapter One:

On a balmy summer afternoon, the sun sets over Moore Park as hordes of passionate Beastie Boys fans make their way towards the Hordern Pavilion. Excited kids with trucker hats on surreptitiously down longnecks of VB under trees, occasionally screaming ‘Beastie Boys! Fuck yeah!’ to the cute girls that walk by. Rogue scalpers mingle with the crowd gathered outside the Hordern Pavilion, trying to offload overpriced tickets to this sold-out show.

Some of the punters are looking suitably ghettofabulous. Others have decked themselves out in old-school threads, sporting big chains and bright tracksuits, their tongues firmly planted in cheek. Most of the crowd, however, look exceptional only in that they’re so excited, all of them totally pumped to see one of the most consistent and talented bands in the world.

Chapter Two:

The doors are opened, and people head in after being patted down by security. Some make their way to the bar, looking to booze up quickly. Many stake out a position near the stage. Many mingle in the Hordern forecourt, sucking down cigarettes or discussing whether Paul’s Boutique or Ill Communication is the better album.

Those who’ve turned up on time are treated to Scribe, the New Zealand rapper who’s been getting scoring some attention of late, both commercial and critical. Personally selected by the Beastie Boys, Scribe delivers like most expected he would, and those in the Pavilion have a suitably good time.

Chapter Three:

Post-Scribe, the punters push into the Hordern. Anxiously waiting, they sporadically move forward, hoping to get a better view of the Boys when they come out. Before they bound out though, a short film is shown in which Mix Master Mike excavates a mummy in Darwin. The mummy, of course, would like to join Mike up in the DJ booth, just to prove that mummy’s can get down like everyone else. Mike is accommodating, and the mummy joins him high above the crowd. He – Mike, not the mummy - proves why he’s been dubbed the best DJ in the world by scratching and mixing like a man possessed. And then, after being treated to a technical showcase on the decks, it’s time for the Beastie Boys to come out…

And it’s spectacular. Decked out in bright orange tracksuits, Adrock, MCA and Mike D start spouting out Egg Man, a Curtis Mayfield-sampling classic from Paul’s Boutique. The crowd love it. They can’t get enough of it. Strangers look to each other, beaming, their eyes lit up.

And the hits don’t stop. Old-school favourite Brass Monkey comes up next, Root Down is dropped and Pass The Mic is delivered. Then, a drum fill spurts out the speakers, and the crowd knows it’s officially on like fucking Donkey Kong, as Adrock raps ‘now, I rock a house party at the drop of a hat / And I beat a biter down with an aluminum bat’ and, yes, it’s Shake Your Rump. Released in ’89, it sounds fresher than ever.

Then the orange tracksuits disappear, along with the guys wearing them. And MixMaster shows us some more of his tricks, mixing and twisting and matching and scratching and generally showing all the aspiring DJ nerds in the crowd how it’s done.

Chapter Four:

Now, what’s this? The curtain is raised, and there’s keyboardist Money Mark in a suit. And there’s the rest of the boys. And an afro-sporting bongo player named Alfonso. And they’re playing the funky instrumental Sabrosa. And then Lighten Up. And then – oh, my lord! – Something’s Got To Give. It’s a chilled-out, slowed-down instrumental extravaganza, with the Beasties showing they don’t need mics to their mouths to get down.

Those who came here to see hit after hit look a little perturbed and, maybe, a little bored. But those who’ve spent nights drinking while The Inside From Way Out! spins are loving every second of it. They’re loving seeing the boys show how truly versatile they are.

Chapter Five:

Then it’s time for some more rap. Want classics? The Beastie Boys deliver: So Whatcha’ Want, Three MCs And One DJ, Time To Get Ill, and the fantastic An Open Letter To NYC from their sadly underappreciated latest album, To The Five Boroughs. The crowd is going buckwild again. Every single person. They adore it. They can’t get enough of it. And the Beastie Boys can’t either. They head off stage after rocking the fuck out, and before you know it, it’s time for the encore.

Chapter Six:

Intergalactic is being performed, but where are the Beastie Boys? Oh, right. They’ve travelled to the back of the Hordern and they’re rapping from the sound desk. So the entire crowd – all couple of thousand of them – turns away from the stage to see the lads delivering their rhymes from in the crowd. Oh lord! It’s almost too good. But, ludicrously, it gets even better.

Chapter Seven:

Guitars have been plugged in, and the drum set has been brought out again. There are distortion pedals on the floor. They’re going to do it… they’re definitely going to do it. But not just yet…

First, they need to play Gratitude, and what a highlight it is. A spectacularly awesome song, delivered with spectacular passion by spectacularly awesome guys. Do I even need to say the crowd loves it? The song ends, and Adrock gives us the bad news: the next song will be their last. ‘I think it’s best if we end things on a high,’ he says. The crowd loudly disagrees, demanding more Beastie Boys action. No one wants this gig to end, and they’ll be as loud as possible to make sure it doesn’t.

But then – yes! They do it! Finally! – they play Sabotage and it’s the best end to a concert the crowd has ever seen. It’s been dedicated to George W. Bush, and all the universal passionate hatred of the man is magically transformed into a universal passionate love of Sabotage. Heads are shaking and hips are moving and people are singing along. And it’s amazing.

And the concert ends. And people go home. But not before looking to each other in shocked disbelief, wondering whether that could be the best concert they’ve ever seen in their lives. Ever.

(Originally published at inthemix.com.au and fasterlouder.com.au).

Friday, January 21, 2005

Film: Kinsey.

The biographical drama tends to be a good thing. When there’s obvious passion for the subject, a brilliant lead, and a genuine desire to get things right, biopics can be spectacular. Think of Michael Mann’s Ali, with an electrified, completely on point Will Smith. Think of Milos Forman’s The People Versus Larry Flynt, with an appropriately rude and crude Woody Harrelson. Think of the classic Raging Bull, one of Scorcese’s best, with a beefed-up Robert De Niro as the pathetic, misogynist Jake LaMotta. Think of X, Spike Lee’s epic – although occasionally flawed – documentary of Malcolm X’s life, with a ludicrously good Denzel Washington in the lead part.

Indeed, the biopic can be stunning, profound and powerful. And Kinsey is all three. It’s a genuinely spectacular film, drawing its power from subtlety, cinematic finesse, and a cast that delivers at every turn.

Directed by Bill Condon – responsible for 1998’s fantastic Gods And Monsters – Kinsey tells the tale of Alfred Kinsey, the author of the groundbreaking 1948 publication entitled Sexual Behavior In The Human Male. Its release shattered puritan assumptions about how little men masturbate, how rarely they engage in homosexual play and how faithful men are. It confirmed what many had thought, but had lacked the confidence and research to say: the vast majority of men are hypersexual beings, and they do a lot of peculiar things a lot of the time.

Liam Neeson, as Kinsey, is everything you could hope for. Sometimes angry, sometimes confused, but always passionately, intensely focused on his studies, often to the detriment of his personal relations. He’s a man who knows there are unspoken truths out there, and he’s willing to put his career on the line in the pursuit of those truths. Neeson is heart-wrenching, and clearly deserves a date with Oscar.

Laura Linney, as Kinsey’s occasionally suffering but always supportive wife, is superb, Peter Saarsgard – who stole much of the show in 2003’s Shattered Glass – is dynamic, mixing frank eroticism with stunning humanity (an impressive effort considering how often Hollywood serves up erotic figures as nothing more than hypersexual caricatures). John Lithgow, as Kinsey’s uptight, domineering father, delivers one of the best performances of his career.

But despite the stupendously good cast, the real star of the show is us, and our attitudes towards sex. The film consistently engages the audience, testing our limits, pushing our buttons, and demanding that we take a look at how far we’ve come in our sexual thinking. And, a little dishearteningly, Kinsey shows us it isn’t far.

Yes, we’re a lot more aware of sexuality, and indeed a lot more accepting. But why are we still shocked by the image of an erect penis on screen – an image that Kinsey displays during one of his lectures at a university, eliciting shocked cries from his students, and us, the audience? How can homophobia still exist today, when it’s so obvious just how fluid human sexuality is, and just how many people are attracted to members of their own sex? Why does sex supposedly offend our sensibilities so much more than violence? Why is pornography so stigmatised when so many people obviously use it?

Kinsey asks these questions and more, but it never stoops to making them explicit. It never forces the issue, it just explores it so well that you’ll soon find yourself carefully examining your attitudes towards sexuality. It’s a film about one man’s struggle for truth, but it’s also about society’s struggle with sex.

The film isn’t quite perfect. It could have dedicated a little more time to establishing just how backward and repressed society was at the time. It could’ve focused more on how sickening the McCarthyist witch hunts of supposed ‘communists’ – Kinsey amongst them – really was.

But these are minor flaws in a film that is spectacularly powerful, and no doubt one of the must-sees of 2005.

(Originally published at inthemix.com.au).

Thursday, January 20, 2005

Music Feature: Asking Sarah Blasko.

After being assigned the enviable task of interviewing Sarah Blasko, I asked a mate at Sydney radio station FBi how his interview with her went. ‘You’ll develop a crush,’ he said. ‘After she left the station, my producer, assistant and I all had one.’

And it’s hard to argue with him. She’s totally likeable, intelligent and funny. Oh yeah, and she’s also released a really good album entitled The Overture & The Underscore. Think David Gray’s White Ladder fronted by Bjork without an accent and Massive Attack doing the programming. Or something similarly awesome.

I sat down with her at Universal Records’ well-designed headquarters in Sydney, overlooking the harbour, and discussed literature, religion and daggy Paul McCartney records.

Your lyrics are pretty literary. Do you have literary idols or books that you really like?

I studied English literature at uni, and I did heaps of old-style classics. I don’t know if any of them were really an influence, but I did a whole session on Shakespeare and a whole session on Jane Austen.

You lyrics have got that kind of Emily Bronte thing going.

She wrote Wuthering Heights, didn’t she?

I think so.

Yeah, I’m pretty sure she did. Yeah, that’s certainly an amazing work of fiction. I think there is a bit of a melancholic, dark tone to some of the stuff that I write. I’ve got a lot of religious guilt under – or over – tones… I guess it’s just an outpouring of the things that I think about, and the problems that I have.

Do you suffer from the infamous Catholic guilt?

Well, no. I didn’t have a Catholic upbringing. [I have] Protestant guilt.

So there’s a branch of Protestant guilt?

(Laughs) Perhaps. I think that, like a lot of people who grew up with a Christian upbringing, I have quite an unbalanced view on life. Deep down, I guess, there’s always this pervading sense that things are either really, really good or really, really bad. There’s not much in-between. I think that tends to come through in my music.

Do you think where we are, at the beginning of 2005, that things are good?

No, I think they’re really shit (laughs). I think there’s a lot of really bad stuff going on. I don’t know – I don’t really like to get into too many debates or deep philosophical arguments, because I find that I just dig myself into a hole.

I actually feel sort of optimistic about my life at the moment. I don’t really know…

(Originally published at fasterlouder.com.au. Click here for the full interview transcript).

Wednesday, January 19, 2005

Politics: Oh Labor, What Has Become Of Thee?

Labor, oh Labor, what has become of thee?

Things are rarely this ugly in the Labor camp. Sure, there's alway in-fighting, bitching and back-stabbing, but it's not often that things are this bad. And, really, Labor only has itself to blame.

Of course, Latham deserves to have the fingers pointed at him. He should have been honest, the pundits and punters will say. If he was sick, he should have told us he was sick. If he was on holiday, he should have told us he was on holiday. Blah blah. It's all true - Latham, since the election, has been his own worst enemy, burning out instead of keeping the flames of Labor's opposition bright and burning.

I have a theory - and it's not the most mind-blowing leap - that the vast majority of Australians want to vote for a Labor government; they just need a reason. They need Labor to show them that education and health are important. They need Labor to remind them that the heart is more important than the wallet. And they need Labor to play by their own rules, dictating their own policies.

Instead, the Australian public is handed a Labor party willing to play the Liberals at their own ugly game, in which economic management is all-important and kids-maybe-thrown-overboard can decide an election. Instead of fighting with all the scrappy, working-class heart the party is supposed to have, they turn up at election time, get a bit dazed and confused, and get owned like the disorganised mongs that they are.

Who will lead the party now? Kevin Rudd clearly has the acumen and the personality of a leader but he looks like a bit too much like a munchkin (although looking like a furry garden gnome hasn't halted Howard's career, so perhaps Rudd could still be in with a chance). There's Stephen Smith, who is apparently a very clever man, but who is completely creepy in interviews, staring at the interviewer with his cold, beady eyes that seem to say 'I want to lick your eyeballs.' There's Julia Gillard, who is almost universally praised in the party for her intelligence and political maturity... but she's a woman. And, pathetically, Australia just isn't ready to make such a leap.

The best bet is Beazley. Sure, he won't win the next election, but he'll give it a shot. And if Rudd has a crack now, he's at great risk of suffering the same fate as Latham, burning out before he was ever given a chance.

Whoever leads, I beg of you Labor, change! Give Australia the reason it needs!

(Originally published in The Brag in the Fear & Loathing column).

(Photo: Labor man Stephen Smith, renowned pastry cook).

Saturday, January 15, 2005

Classic Album: Tim Buckley - Greetings From LA.

What’s white and twelve inches? Nothing.

Zing! Indeed, most scientific surveys of the international state of the male member seem to indicate that white folk aren’t quite packing heat downstairs. Sure, most scientific surveys of penis size will have dubious results because men are terrible liars, and convincing heaps of them to take off their pants for science is fairly difficult.

It’s studies like this that contribute to the reputation white guys have – perhaps not so unfairly – for being doofuses who can’t jump, dance, or make red hot passionate love. And this view permeates music; if you’re aiming to get down and messy, you’re a little more likely to put on Marvin Gaye’s brilliant Let’s Get It On than Phil Collins’ brilliant-for-different reasons No Jacket Required. (Although if the sound of sexy Phil singing Sussudio makes your chest flush red and your breath get heavy, all power to you).

But there’s one frizzy-haired honky who could definitely pull his weight when it comes to music written between the sheets. With the high cheek bones and refined good looks that would later be seen in his son Jeff, Tim Buckley was that honky. He was totally white – both physically, and for much of his career, culturally – but he could get as hot as Gaye and as wild as Hendrix. He showed the music world that black or white, we all bleed red, and that red blood pumps down to where it counts in the same way for everyone.

With Greetings From LA, Tim is pure sex – cheating and slutting and thrusting his way through seven soul rock numbers. And, at the time, it was a shock. Before Greetings... Tim was a folkie through and through. Sure, he was a little more attractively esoteric, and he was far more willing to mix up his influences than others. But listening to his debut self-titled album – on which he sings sad, innocent, wide-eyed, restrained folk-pop numbers – it’s difficult to imagine he would come out with an album like Greetings….

But we’re all the better for it because he did. While his early albums are extremely attractive thanks to his beautiful, nigh-operatic, earnest vocals, it’s when he gets his groove on that the brilliance of Buckley comes through.

On the opening track, Move With Me, you know it’s on. It’s really fucking on. It’s funked-up, it’s hot, it’s sweaty, it’s a little bit ugly, it’s dirty. And it’s spectacular. When Tim sings the opening lines 'I went down to the meat rack tavern / And found myself a big ol’ healthy girl / Now she was drinkin’ alone / Aw, what a waste of sin' he pumps the words out with a confidence and lusty zeal that no one had heard from him before. It was a revelation. And more than 30 years after it was released, it still is.

Things don’t stop there. The album just gets better. On Sweet Surrender, he explains his predilection for infidelity with notably sleazy self-satisfaction 'Now you wanna’ know the reason / Why I cheated on you / Well, I had to be the hunter again / This little man had to try / To make love feel new again.' It’s less an explanation than a proclamation. He’s going to get his, and he doesn’t care who it hurts. It’s brutal, but he’s putting it out there, and his libido evidently won’t be restrained.

By the time he gets to the album closer, Make It Right, he’s embraced his desires with a relish rarely seen in music. ‘Come on and beat me, whip me, spank me,’ he begs, ‘mama, make it right again.’ Yeah, it’s still on. And it's not going to stop 'til Tim gets off.

Only Nighthawkin’ steers away from sex, but the music doesn’t seem to have noticed the thematic adjustment. It’s still hot, and it’s still heavy, and those guitars are still pumping and the horns are still blowing. Tim talks about a drunk holding a knife to his throat, and for a second, you can see hormones are still on his mind, as he sings as if the rush of near-violence isn’t any different to the rush to orgasm.

Every track is a winner, but it’s Get On Top where Tim really shows us how it’s going to go down. With a killer riff kicking things off, the funk gets so heavy it almost hurts. Imagine the shock when Tim’s folkie fans – used to romantic ballads and tales of broken hearts – listened to a man in the throes of musical ecstasy, reciting a chorus of ‘Get on top of me woman’ – a breath – ‘I just wanna’ see what you learned.’

There it is, right there. Not too slow and not too fast. And it almost hurts because it’s so good. That’s Greetings From LA, and that’s the best album the brilliant Tim Buckley ever produced.

(Originally published at fasterlouder.com.au in the Replay/Rewind section).

Friday, January 14, 2005

Album Review: Rolling Stones - Live Licks.

They look like the Rolling Stones, ignoring the wrinkles here and there. They move like the Rolling Stones, with the Jagger swagger still in tact and the physical rambling of Keith still in full force. You can see Charlie behind the drumkit. And that's definitely Ronnie on the left, isn't it? This is the band that's written (I Can't Get No) Satisfaction, Sympathy For The Devil, She Smiled Sweetly, Street Fightin' Man, Paint It fuckin' Black! Isn't it?

Yes and no. They're not the Rolling Stones as you want to know them. They're not the rogue British bluesmen who produced Exile On Main Street. They're not the Rolling Stones who frightened the establishment, fucked with the man, excited the young. They're not the Rolling Stones who'd write confronting lines like 'Who killed the Kennedys / When after all It was you and me.'

No, they're not the Rolling Stones of old. The cover of Live Licks may have a topless girl on it, but that's about as interesting and confronting as the Stones get nowadays.

They're the Rolling Stones of the 21st Century. And time may not have wearied them, but it has worn away the harsh edges and dirty soul. They're a covers band, and they do what they do well, but the passion isn't quite there.

Of course, they'll tell you they still have it. They'll tell you the blues fires still burn brightly within them. They'll tell you that the love will always be there, and that they just want to share that love with the world. Which is fine, for them. For us - sitting fifty seven rows back, or at home with a cup of coffee - things aren't quite the same.

But I'm not the first to say that, am I? Critics and know-all wankers have been speaking of the death of the Stones for decades, trying to pinpoint the exact moment when the real dinosaurs of rock died out, frozen and lonely after years of meteoric new-rock have punished their early-'60s landscape.

Those punters - and I - will never be able to pinpoint that moment. Because the Stones never died. They just got old. And for a bunch of old codgers, they're doing alright for themselves. On Live Licks, a two-CD collection of live tracks from their recent world tour, you're exposed to a band that still has the chops - Ronnie, Charlie and Keith especially - but knows all too acutely that their mere existence is entertainment enough for most. They can just turn up, and most punters will rock-swoon.

Jagger, especially, seems content to turn up, spastically jump around a bit, and then hobble off to the next city. He's running by rote. On some tracks he's off-key and delivering the vocals by like a man possessed by demons of mediocrity. The extraordinary perfection of Paint It, Black is musically all there, but Jagger may as well resort to muttering 'I see a red door...blah blah, you know the rest kids! Try the veal!'

There's the sense they're just going through the motions. There's no fire, and there's no ice, and there's no edge. They've gone a little middle-of-the-road. I mean, christ, Sheryl bloody Crow turns up to sing on Honky Tonk Woman.

But hey, it's the Rolling Stones. Like pizza, sex, and zombie movies, even when they're bad they're still pretty good. They may have lost it, but most bands have never even found it. This compilation isn't going to inspire the lusty adoration of a new generation, but it's an acceptable reminder that the Stones have been together as long as my parents have been alive, and they're still going.

So, hey, kudos to them, right? When Mick screams All right! All right! and that famous (I Can't Get No) Satisfaction riff fires up, you can't help but develop a soft spot for the Stones of the 21st Century. Even if they really would do well to retire and live out their lives on yachts, drinking Moet for breakfast and occasionally impregnating hot South American models.

(Originally published at fasterlouder.com.au).

Classic Album: Bob Dylan - The Essential Bob Dylan.

You know when you wake up and you’re still a little drunk? And maybe you’re a little bit sweaty, and feeling gross, and the sun is blazing down on you through an open window and you just want to sleep but it’s just too fucking hot? And you roll over and look at your watch and it’s already 11am, and you’re sleeping on a mate’s couch? And you have a mysterious cut on your hand which means you have to get a tetanus shot?

Yeah, maybe that’s just me. This morning. After having been teetotal for a little too long, I thought it high time to get a little bit retarded, and so, on a balmy Thursday night, my mates and I went out and drank cheap long island ice teas in a pseudo-classy Newtown pub. And that’s why, at 11am, I woke up needing a tetanus shot.

Indeed, that’s what you get when you get a little bit buckwild. I lay on my mate’s couch with an arm over my face, blocking out the sun. Then I got stumbled up, found a collection of Seinfeld scripts and read them. Later, post-coffee, my mate walked in and we talked about Bob Dylan, as you do.

‘Some people say he’s done more with words than anyone since Shakespeare,’ he said, dropping to the couch. ‘Yeah,’ I said, more than a little sceptical, ‘you’d say that.’ Dylan’s good, I thought, but he’s no Shakespeare.

But later, eating a disconcertingly delicious chicken salad, it occurred to me that maybe Bob Dylan has done more with words than anyone since Shakespeare. Maybe you can compare ‘the ghosts of electricity howl in the bones of her face’ to ‘Death lies on her, like an ultimately frost upon the sweetest flower of all the field.’ Maybe, when we tally the literary greats, Bob will be up the top of the list. Voltaire, Heller, Hunter S. Thompson, Hemingway, Dylan. Yeah, I thought, that works.

But what is it about Dylan? What makes him so incredibly special, so desperately vital? It’s not just that he basically invented profound lyrical honesty. It’s not just that he combines a keen understanding of the power of words with a preternatural ability to use them. No, it’s that he captures everything. Everything.

Like an impressionist painter, he can get it all in one stroke. Frustration (Maggie’s Farm), loss (Sara), hope (The Times They Are A-Changin’), longing (I Want You). His music is the micro and the macro; the big picture and the little details; mass tragedy and personal loss; the cyclone and those in its path. Hurricane, from the spectacular Desire album, is the tale of one man wronged by the system, and simultaneously the tale of far too many like him. Without saying it, Dylan’s lyrics capture waking up at 11am, still a little drunk; his words understand how good a delicious chicken salad really is. And they know how bad it can be to lose what you love. If he hasn’t been there himself, his words have. And they’ll take you along. Nothing is left out.

The fact that he manages to combine such extraordinary literary talents with such a genuinely fine ear for music is awe-inspiring. Don’t Think Twice, It’s Alright doesn’t just have great lyrics – it’s also a bloody good tune.

But no matter how good the music that frames his lyrics is, it’s always the words that are going to get the attention. It’s his words that have inspired devotion in a massive legion of obsessive, geeky fans who will discuss the relative merits of Blood On The Tracks, as opposed to Blonde On Blonde, for hours. And hours. And hours.

I’m not one of those geeks – not quite. Which is why I’m happy to call The Essential Bob Dylan a classic album, despite it being a compilation. Sure, ‘greatest hits’ packages take away the artistry of a complete album, and most of Dylans albums – well, most of the early ones and a couple of the later ones – are absolutely deserving of inclusion here on Replay/Rewind. But Dylan is one of the few artists who genuinely deserve such a ‘top hits’ compilation. Owning The Essential Bob Dylan is, uh, essential.

It will show you, in two discs, just how incredible Dylan is. It dishes up a lot of tracks – 36 all up – and almost every one of them is awesome. Sure, the epic, profoundly sad Sara – probably one of Dylan’s best tracks ever – isn’t here. But when you’ve got It Ain’t Me, Babe, Subterranean Homesick Blues, Tangled Up In Blue,, All Along The Watchtower, Just Like A Woman collected here, it’s hard to be too offended by one little oversight.

Go and buy Blood On The Tracks, Blonde On Blonde, Desire and all those Dylan albums you’re supposed to own. They’re all amazing. But buy The Essential.. . as well. And next time you’re still a bit drunk at 11am, put it on and listen to Dylan for a couple of hours. Just lie back and let the words wash over you like the brutal sun. An, like me, after thinking about it for a while – maybe over a delicious chicken salad – you’ll too realise that Dylan is one of the most important writers in our history.

(Originally published at fasterlouder.com.au in the Replay/Rewind section).

Classic Album: Bruce Springsteen - Nebraska.

Me, A Year Ago: You’re not serious dude. You’re calling a Bruce Springsteen album a classic? What have you become? He’s such a knobhead, with his soul patch, singlets and predilection for denim. And he writes huge, bombastic songs like Born In The USA, with patently awful production. He claims to represent the working-class whilst raking in the cash from an army of misled but unfortunately loyal fans. What are you doing?!

Me, Now: Dude, seriously, wait until you hear Nebraska. If you’re me a year ago, then I suppose you’ll hear it soon enough. You’ll hear Atlantic City played in a pub, and it’s chorus – ‘everything dies baby that’s a fact / maybe everything that dies some day comes back’ – will haunt you for hours. No, days. Weeks.

Me, A Year Ago: That’s actually not going to happen. I will never willingly listen to a Bruce Springsteen song, because he’s a total knobhead. I’m not sure of that many things in life – fuck, I’m tossing up between journalism, politics and astronomy – but I’m sure of The Boss being a toss.

Me, Now: Firstly, you never wanted to get into astronomy, like, ever. Remember that I am you, just one year in the future. So I know that you’re not interested in astrononomy. And secondly, you will hear Atlantic City and it’ll make you want to openly weep into your beer. And a few days after hearing it in that inner-city pub, you’ll buy Nebraska. You’ll see it in a shop and be instantly desperate to be it, your interested piqued by the enigmatic black, white and red cover showing a desolate landscape in the American Midwest.

Me, A Year Ago: No, it’s not true. I’ll be happy listening to Chris Isaak, Rage Against The Machine and Portishead. And no Bruce Springsteen.

Me, Now: Don’t worry. You still like those bands. Especially Chris Isaak – he really is great isn’t he? But you just need to accept that you will very soon adore Nebraska like you should. Like everyone should. You’ll be amazed that it’s a passionate, intense record with all the hallmarks of a lo-fi emo record before lo-fi emo records existed. It’s like a Bright Eyes record without the affectations and self-consciousness. It’s just Bruce Springsteen, his slightly-mistuned acoustic guitar, a harmonica, and a four-track. It’s Bruce singing about death and destruction and love and family and everything that means something.

Me, A Year Ago: Seriously?

Me, Now: Completely. Your blood will run cold when listening to the chilling title track, with its stark portrayal of innocence and murder. It’s opening line – ‘I saw her standing on the front lawn / just twirlin’ her baton’ – a beautiful thematic non-sequitur on an album filled with hate, greed, menace and murder. Your heart will sink listening to Highway Patrolman; the story of a policeman caught between his duty to the world around him and his duty to his brother. You’ll be strangled by the surging menace of State Trooper, with its simple acoustic guitar riff lulling you into a world where you might die on a wet highway, your family shattered, just because you did your job. My Father’s House will strike you as one of the most moving evocations of hope and loss ever recorded; the tale of a man searching for himself in a forest full of ugly secrets. You’ll be stunned every time you hear Atlantic City, a stunning portrait of a man trying to deal with a world full of death and terrible madness.

And you’ll realise, after listening to the album just once, that it’s one of the best albums of all time – a stunning testament to an artist who is too often caricatured as nothing more than a token musical concession to the aspirations of the American working class. An artist who, with Nebraska, surprised everyone, and showed us how powerful one man with a guitar can be.

Me, A Year Ago: Dude. I’m kind of looking forward to hearing Atlantic City in that pub now. Can you, like, tell me which pub it is?

Me, Now: Dude, no. That’ll fuck with the space / time continuum or something, and I’ll end up as a rabbi or a pony or something, and my parents will never meet, and Harold Holt won’t go missing and people will drink bathwater just for fun. Haven’t you seen any of the Back To The Future movies? Anyway, you’ll hear it soon enough. And when you do, you’ll be blown away.

Me, A Year Ago: You know I’ve seen all three and love them.

Me, Now: Oh yeah, right.

(Originally published at fasterlouder.com.au in the Replay/Rewind section).

Thursday, January 13, 2005

Politics: Down The Hume: A Melbourne Trip.

A road trip to Melbourne is illuminating in some ways. It's not the realisation that there seems to be a Subway in every single town. It's not the fact that finding internet access out of urban areas is really annoying. It's not that every Chinese restaurant out of the city seems to only serve sweet and sour pork and dim sims.

No, it's just how terribly urban-centric most of my views are. I'm a predictably educated, liberal, anti-lots-of-things nerd, who detests how many people are forced into homelessness in the city, and loathes how many live in poverty in the suburbs. I'm unsurprisingly against the perpetuation of ugly urban sprawl, in which cash is thrown like candy to rich bitch bureaucrats with hearts of ice to spend on gross grey buildings. But for all my left-wing wankery, I rarely think about how different things are out of Sydney proper.

Spending time in regional centres like Goulburn, Albury, Wodonga, Dandenong, and elsewhere is a necessary reminder that the issues across Australia are vastly different. Speaking to 'average Aussie battlers' - to join A Current Affair in condescendingly labelling them as such - who work at drought-affected farms or for underpaying industry tells you that most people don't have the time - nevermind the means - to fight battles that aren't their's.

Decrying Australia's vastly spread out population for electing an abomination like John Howard again and again is easy, and probably totally justified. But people vote Dickhead for a reason: they have no choice but to focus on supposed 'economic management' and side with the party aligned with the 'regional representatives,' the Nationals.

When you live in a politically and socially insular place, the exposure to 'big problems' that face Australia and indeed the world just isn't there. For the most part, there just isn't a culture in the vast majority of Australia conducive to looking at the macro instead of the micro, the greater good instead of the personal advantage. Because - shock horror! - most people aren't middle-class, uppity uni students with the time nor inclination to 'fight the good fight.'

Sure, all this is terribly obvious, and pointing it out inevitably produces a sub-text that says 'hey! Farmers and regional people! You suck for voting in Howard! Go to university you bitches! Vote Greens and eat tofu!' Indeed. That's inevitable considering I am an uppity educated, Greens-or-Labor-if-I'm-drunk voting nerd. And I love tofu.

But however obvious it may be, before venturing out on a road trip down the Hume and through shitloads of small towns - with giant sheep and big submarines and all that - I'd forgotten just how ludicrously huge Australia really is. It's massive. And people are everywhere. And they - shock horror! again - generally have very different personal priorities when compared to urban-dwellers. And whilst those who live in the country may be a lot more tolerant and informed than they're usually given credit for, most of them are still going to vote for the Nationals or the Liberals. Again and again. Because they think they have to. Because there's an underlying sense that they're the forgotten people of Australia, doomed to be represented only by Akubra-wearing knobheads in Telstra commercials.

So what? Well, it made me feel a bit better about the Liberal win October. Now, almost, I can see why people would vote in Howard. Almost.

(Originally published in The Brag in the Fear & Loathing column).